- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:40:05 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 8 Jan 2015 at 23:40, Holger Knublauch wrote: > > On 1/9/15, 7:48 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> Ignoring the dereferenceability stuff for a moment: do you think it >> makes sense to keep something like hydra:Class given that they are >> quite different from RDFS classes due to hydra:supportedProperty? Of >> course assuming we keep hydra:supportedProperty in more or less this >> form :-) > > Why could hydra:supportedProperty not be used for any rdfs:Class? Of course it can be used on any rdfs:Class, hydra:Class is, after all, a subclass of rdfs:Class. It is just that the model is quite different from RDFS and much closer to the one of most OO programming languages. As such, it might be worth to give it a name. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 23:40:27 UTC