W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2012

RE: Info from HTML5 editors: merging WHATWG patches

From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 13:06:10 +0000
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
CC: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0CB063710346B446A5B5DC305BF8EA3E27AF41@Ex2010MBX.development.algonquinstudios.com>

I am stil new to the process around here, but I just want to make sure I understand -- this means @srcset is moving to the on hold / wait for HTML.next branch, but that <picture> is still under consideration.

Am I correct?

What's the process if WHATWG runs with @srcset and this WG hasn't come to consensus on <picture>?


> From: Silvia Pfeiffer [silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
> 
> Thanks for your feedback. That agrees with my initial reaction -
> thanks for confirming.
> I'll plan to move that branch to B3 where it can wait until there will
> be a HTML.next spec.
> 
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Silvia,
> >
> > many thanks for your work!
> >
> >>*  feature/whatwg_srcset
> >  > This patch introduces the @srcset attribute on images.
> >  > Review here:
> >   >https://github.com/w3c/html/compare/master...feature;whatwg_srcset
> >
> > Since the <picture> element is under active consideration by the WG
> > and there is no consensus on srcset or <picture>
> >
> > I would suggest not to add srcset at this time.
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2012 13:06:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 9 September 2012 13:06:38 GMT