Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback by Amicable Resolution

On 8/22/2012 9:54 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 8/22/2012 6:07 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> On 08/02/2012 04:06 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>
>>>> In regards to the text in question I am prepared to withdraw my change
>>>> proposal in favour of Teds.
>>>
>>> This leaves only one active Change Proposal on this issue:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-201&oldid=13386 
>>>
>>>
>>> At the current time, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on
>>> this proposal.  If anybody would like to raise an objection during
>>> this time, we will require them to accompany their objection with a
>>> concrete and complete change proposal.
>>>
>>> If no objections are raised to this call by August 30th, 2012, we will
>>> direct the editors to make the proposed change, and will only consider
>>> subsequently reopening this issue based on new information and a
>>> complete change proposal based on the spec's contents as it exists
>>> after this change is applied.
>>
>> The "Eoconnor" CP is a vast departure from the spec as it existed prior
>> and as it is implemented.
>> I don't believe one week is enough time to complete and submit a
>> concrete counter-proposal.
>
> Some relevant context:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jan/0080.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0267.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Apr/0068.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Aug/0062.html 

Some text I posted in April, in response to the Eoconnor CP:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Cpritcha/ISSUE-201-eoconnor-counter

-Charles

Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 17:16:57 UTC