W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2011

Re: General Questions on HTML5 Link Relations, Registries, etc.

From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:44:40 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTikjg9X2NwB4t-tMLcs2rLsncazVUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Henri:

Thanks for the quick follow-up; that is helpful information. I notice
you already edited the Microformats Wiki to start building a list that
is compliant w/ the HTML5 draft, too. Thanks.

I am still looking for some feedback on the first part of my query:
that of clarifying the meaning/use of "Hyperlink", "External
Resource", and "Annotation."  A pointer to some examples of each would
be fine since that seems to be the only thing missing form the HTML5
draft at this time.

mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me


#RESTFest 2010
http://rest-fest.googlecode.com




On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:37, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:13 -0400, mike amundsen wrote:
>> Finally, I currently know of four registries that contain some level
>> of Link Relation content:
>> IANA - http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xml
>> Microformats - http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values
>> Paramsr.us - http://paramsr.us/link-relation-types/
>> Dublink Core - http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/
>>
>> Are there others I have not listed here that should be considered?
>> Should these registries be viewed as a related? a co-operating group?
>> at odds with each other? From the HTML5 POV, should one or more list
>> be viewed as "sanctioned" or canonical while others should be viewed
>> as "rogue" or contrary to standards?
>
> Only http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values is referenced from
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types . Thus, the
> others have no bearing on HTML5.
>
> As for the content of http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values ,
> right now the vast majority of the link types documented there are not
> registered with all the data
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types requires
> registrations to have, so the pre-existing content on the wiki that
> doesn't meet the formalities required by HTML5 has to be considered not
> to constitute registrations at this time.
>
> --
> Henri Sivonen
> hsivonen@iki.fi
> http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 15:45:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:24 UTC