W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2011

Re: General Questions on HTML5 Link Relations, Registries, etc.

From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:22:11 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTikr417_x=Vz9=9Y3ZNT5+fvsEr+1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org
I see Julian described some of these "link types" about a year ago
here [1] but I haven't found any follow up to that thread (dealing
with the three "types").

Are there any definitive examples of each type available?


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/0225.html

mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me


#RESTFest 2011
http://rest-fest.org




On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:44, mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Henri:
>
> Thanks for the quick follow-up; that is helpful information. I notice
> you already edited the Microformats Wiki to start building a list that
> is compliant w/ the HTML5 draft, too. Thanks.
>
> I am still looking for some feedback on the first part of my query:
> that of clarifying the meaning/use of "Hyperlink", "External
> Resource", and "Annotation."  A pointer to some examples of each would
> be fine since that seems to be the only thing missing form the HTML5
> draft at this time.
>
> mca
> http://amundsen.com/blog/
> http://twitter.com@mamund
> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
>
>
> #RESTFest 2010
> http://rest-fest.googlecode.com
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:37, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:13 -0400, mike amundsen wrote:
>>> Finally, I currently know of four registries that contain some level
>>> of Link Relation content:
>>> IANA - http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xml
>>> Microformats - http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values
>>> Paramsr.us - http://paramsr.us/link-relation-types/
>>> Dublink Core - http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/
>>>
>>> Are there others I have not listed here that should be considered?
>>> Should these registries be viewed as a related? a co-operating group?
>>> at odds with each other? From the HTML5 POV, should one or more list
>>> be viewed as "sanctioned" or canonical while others should be viewed
>>> as "rogue" or contrary to standards?
>>
>> Only http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values is referenced from
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types . Thus, the
>> others have no bearing on HTML5.
>>
>> As for the content of http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values ,
>> right now the vast majority of the link types documented there are not
>> registered with all the data
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types requires
>> registrations to have, so the pre-existing content on the wiki that
>> doesn't meet the formalities required by HTML5 has to be considered not
>> to constitute registrations at this time.
>>
>> --
>> Henri Sivonen
>> hsivonen@iki.fi
>> http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:22:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:24 UTC