- From: Dailey, David P. <david.dailey@sru.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:19:52 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Sam, you wrote: >I will note that the W3C has not moved to a living standards model. >Unless somebody wants to advocate that the W3C do so, I would like to >suggest that anybody who wishes to discuss this topic further do so >elsewhere. At the very minimum, please drop public-html from the cc list Good and +! Given that W3C is now thinking about a logo for HTML5, perhaps it is time to differentiate between HTML5(W3C) and HTML5(WHATWG). Perhaps the former co-chair Chris Wilson of Microsoft and I foresaw this moment [1]. The recommendation would be that the living spec be called (at least by the standards body) HTML 5.<span style="text-decoration: overline">5</span>. I can imagine a very cool logo for that (it would, of course, use both recursion and SMIL and rewrite itself dynamically!). Cheers David [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/0225.html
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 15:20:29 UTC