W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

RE: hgroup: a possible alternative

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:30:07 +0100
To: Dean Leigh <dean.leigh@deanleigh.co.uk>
Cc: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, HTML WG LIST <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110112203007706941.8e1bbae5@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Dean Leigh, Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:18:49 -0000:

> I agree with the roles as defined by Leif on this one i.e.
  [...]
> I assume the next questions will be should we allow more than 1 <hx> 
> within an <hgroup>?

Doesn't fit with well with roles I proposed, to have more than hx.
 
> The current example from 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/sections.html#the-header-element  
> is:
> 
> <header>
>  <hgroup>
>   <h1>Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.2</h1>
>   <h2>W3C Working Draft 27 October 2004</h2>
>  </hgroup>

> If <header> restarts the level/numbering of the <hx> anyway then does 
> this example really need <hgroup>?

??? That example ends with a note which says 'The header element is not 
sectioning content; it doesn't introduce a new section.' Thus header 
doesn't restart the level/numbering.
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 19:30:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:21 UTC