W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

RE: hgroup: a possible alternative

From: Dean Leigh <dean.leigh@deanleigh.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:35:47 -0000
Message-ID: <1174F8ED82AF7048905B3241C81BF17BC1654D@HEMV1AUKER.he.local>
To: "Leif Halvard Silli" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "HTML WG LIST" <public-html@w3.org>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Leif Halvard Silli [mailto:xn--mlform-iua@målform.no]
>>Sent: 12 January 2011 19:30
>>To: Dean Leigh
>>Cc: Philip Jägenstedt; HTML WG LIST
>>Subject: RE: hgroup: a possible alternative
>>Dean Leigh, Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:18:49 -0000:
>>> <header>
>>>  <hgroup>
>>>   <h1>Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.2</h1>
>>>   <h2>W3C Working Draft 27 October 2004</h2>  </hgroup>
>>> If <header> restarts the level/numbering of the <hx> anyway then does
>>> this example really need <hgroup>?
>>??? That example ends with a note which says 'The header element is not
>>sectioning content; it doesn't introduce a new section.' Thus header doesn't
>>restart the level/numbering.

Good point - so it would only restart in a <section> or <article> ?

Dean Leigh

Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 19:36:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:18 GMT