W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-124: rel-limits - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:11:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6C2B8D.3010703@intertwingly.net>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 02/28/2011 05:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>
>>> The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the
>>> problem anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I
>>> would expect to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually
>>> be well-defined again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an
>>> improvement to the Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out
>>> how one would go about doing that yet.)
>>
>> Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point?
>
> No idea.

In which case I encourage you (and everybody, for that matter) to ensure 
that whatever points you feel need to be made here are made (or 
referenced) by the survey itself.

Reminder: this poll closes in just under 6 hours:

   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-124-objection-poll/

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 23:11:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:22 UTC