W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-124: rel-limits - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:35:26 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102282235140.1298@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > 
> > The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the 
> > problem anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I 
> > would expect to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually 
> > be well-defined again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an 
> > improvement to the Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out 
> > how one would go about doing that yet.)
> 
> Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point?

No idea.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 22:35:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:22 GMT