W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-124: rel-limits - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:55:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6C19BD.7010000@intertwingly.net>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the problem
> anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I would expect
> to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually be well-defined
> again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an improvement to the
> Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out how one would go about
> doing that yet.)

Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point?

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 21:55:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:22 GMT