On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the problem > anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I would expect > to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually be well-defined > again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an improvement to the > Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out how one would go about > doing that yet.) Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point? - Sam RubyReceived on Monday, 28 February 2011 21:55:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:22 GMT