Re: ISSUE-145 codecs-vs-octet - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

I'm deleting that proposal from the list since a separate bug has now been raised for the broader issue it addresses.

On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 03.02.2011 18:04, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> 
>> The current status for this issue:
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/145
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-145
>> 
>> - We a change proposal to clarify that if "application/octet-stream" appears with any parameter, it should be treated just like any other MIME type.
>> - We have another change proposal to remove<video>  Content-Type.
>> ...
> 
> See <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0410.html> - it would be nice if the chairs could clarify whether the counter-proposal actually is acceptable - I believe it is not.
> 
> Best regards, Julian