W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-145 codecs-vs-octet - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:58:32 -0800
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <E6397765-5EF3-4ADC-BCBE-7756C61A6D22@apple.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

I'm deleting that proposal from the list since a separate bug has now been raised for the broader issue it addresses.

On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 03.02.2011 18:04, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> 
>> The current status for this issue:
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/145
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-145
>> 
>> - We a change proposal to clarify that if "application/octet-stream" appears with any parameter, it should be treated just like any other MIME type.
>> - We have another change proposal to remove<video>  Content-Type.
>> ...
> 
> See <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0410.html> - it would be nice if the chairs could clarify whether the counter-proposal actually is acceptable - I believe it is not.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 19:57:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:22 GMT