W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-145 codecs-vs-octet - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:13:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4D4AE235.4040902@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 03.02.2011 18:04, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> The current status for this issue:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/145
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-145
>
> - We a change proposal to clarify that if "application/octet-stream" appears with any parameter, it should be treated just like any other MIME type.
> - We have another change proposal to remove<video>  Content-Type.
> ...

See <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0410.html> 
- it would be nice if the chairs could clarify whether the 
counter-proposal actually is acceptable - I believe it is not.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:14:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:22 GMT