W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:59:26 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTikN7WQmGG4HYq2eOpmeUUJ=+iUsOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Operationally, there is little difference between quickly responding -- even
> to reasonable inquiries -- and ongoing discussion.  Additionally, I would
> rather not discuss decisions that already are the subject of a Formal
> Objection.

Note that jgraham's new information and intended action regarding a
new change proposal are both directly relevant to my objection; it was
precisely the discarding of similar information that caused me to
raise the objection in the first place.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 16:00:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:27 GMT