W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:00:18 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilGo2YpUQDTCG_RiS5A064_lD7tZDRrsnjaAh_H@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
2010/6/12 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>:
> Ian Hickson, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC):
>  […]
>> The WHATWG draft continues to exist because it's the
>> only way to have a specification that actually makes
>> sense in the face of the ridiculous decisions you keep making.
>  […]
>
> Thanks for relaying to us that
>
> (1)  you've considered making the WHATwg copy cease to exist, and
> (2)  that its existence isn't related to "a much better license".

I don't think either of those conclusions follow from what Ian wrote.

Adam
Received on Sunday, 13 June 2010 21:01:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC