W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 00:55:01 +0200
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100613005501262638.f1c76f29@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Ian Hickson, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC):

  []
> The WHATWG draft continues to exist because it's the 
> only way to have a specification that actually makes 
> sense in the face of the ridiculous decisions you keep making.
  []

Thanks for relaying to us that 

(1)  you've considered making the WHATwg copy cease to exist, and
(2)  that its existence isn't related to "a much better license".
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Saturday, 12 June 2010 22:55:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:09 GMT