W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 00:55:01 +0200
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100613005501262638.f1c76f29@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Ian Hickson, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC):

> The WHATWG draft continues to exist because it's the 
> only way to have a specification that actually makes 
> sense in the face of the ridiculous decisions you keep making.

Thanks for relaying to us that 

(1)  you've considered making the WHATwg copy cease to exist, and
(2)  that its existence isn't related to "a much better license".
leif halvard silli
Received on Saturday, 12 June 2010 22:55:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:03 UTC