W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:57:19 +0200
To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100614035719322336.dd6266f3@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Adam Barth, Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:00:18 -0700:
> 2010/6/12 Leif Halvard Silli :
>> Ian Hickson, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC):
>>  […]
>>> The WHATWG draft continues to exist because it's the
>>> only way to have a specification that actually makes
>>> sense in the face of the ridiculous decisions you keep making.
>>  […]
>> 
>> Thanks for relaying to us that
>> 
>> (1)  you've considered making the WHATwg copy cease to exist, and
>> (2)  that its existence isn't related to "a much better license".
> 
> I don't think either of those conclusions follow from what Ian wrote.

Regarding (1), then he underlined the opposite possibility as well:

]] -- I've no idea what we'll do if you make a decision on an issue of 
normative relevance, like many of the issues that you keep pushing back 
and not resolving. [[
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 01:57:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC