W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:16:25 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimsSMX0_u0FcYeWh1z83L2ATeaV2HU6-OwNnzcl@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Leif Halvard Silli
<xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote:
> The need to continue to discus <figure>, <details> etc was not
> expressed in the counter-proposal. If it had been expressed there, then
> not only would it have lowered the ad-hominen smack of the whole
> counter-proposal effort, it could also have lead to more support for it.

I wasn't aware that there was any particular need to assert that this
portion of the spec would continue to be edited like every other
portion of the spec.  It seems redundant to add that into every Change
Proposal written from now on, but I can make sure that it is a part of
any proposals I author from now on if necessary.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 16:30:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC