- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:47:00 +0000
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >> The use case I think is most important for @sandbox is advertising, as >> discussed in some of my earlier emails to the whatwg list. Apologies >> for splitting the discussion over multiple lists. I know it can be >> hard to follow if you're not subscribed to all of them. > > It would help if you provide links to these discussions? There was an extensive discussion. You might start with the threads linked from this page: http://www.google.com/search?q=barth+sandbox+whatwg > No, I never follow > the WhatWG email list. I do search it when I put together change proposals, > but generally don't follow it. I'm assuming that any change that impacts on > the W3C will be documented, either directly or via link, in the W3C email > lists. In general, that's not a valid assumption for HTML5. Discussion about the spec takes place in many forums (fora?). I tend to send most of my technical feedback on the spec to the whatwg list because there's a higher technical content to process ratio there. Adam
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 15:47:53 UTC