W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:42:20 +0000
Message-ID: <7789133a1001250742u3df85877vbe03ee9cb3d33918@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > But let's go further on this. Since I found out that the primary use
>> > case
>> > for this change, and in fact, this whole sandbox issue, is comments,
>> > let's
>> > talk about comments.
>> The use case I think is most important for @sandbox is advertising, as
>> discussed in some of my earlier emails to the whatwg list.  Apologies
>> for splitting the discussion over multiple lists.  I know it can be
>> hard to follow if you're not subscribed to all of them.
> Oh, so the main customer for this change is Google?

I'd say that the main customer is The New York Times (or any other publisher).

Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 15:43:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:00 GMT