W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:42:20 +0000
Message-ID: <7789133a1001250742u3df85877vbe03ee9cb3d33918@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > But let's go further on this. Since I found out that the primary use
>> > case
>> > for this change, and in fact, this whole sandbox issue, is comments,
>> > let's
>> > talk about comments.
>>
>> The use case I think is most important for @sandbox is advertising, as
>> discussed in some of my earlier emails to the whatwg list.  Apologies
>> for splitting the discussion over multiple lists.  I know it can be
>> hard to follow if you're not subscribed to all of them.
>
> Oh, so the main customer for this change is Google?

I'd say that the main customer is The New York Times (or any other publisher).

Adam
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 15:43:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:00 GMT