W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:03:46 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0271001250703u48dadfc6o9cdc50e219ee6c72@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:

> Shelley,
>
> I didn't read all of your email because it was too long, but I wanted
> to respond to something near the beginning:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > But let's go further on this. Since I found out that the primary use case
> > for this change, and in fact, this whole sandbox issue, is comments,
> let's
> > talk about comments.
>
> The use case I think is most important for @sandbox is advertising, as
> discussed in some of my earlier emails to the whatwg list.  Apologies
> for splitting the discussion over multiple lists.  I know it can be
> hard to follow if you're not subscribed to all of them.
>
> Adam
>

It would help if you provide links to these discussions? No, I never follow
the WhatWG email list. I do search it when I put together change proposals,
but generally don't follow it. I'm assuming that any change that impacts on
the W3C will be documented, either directly or via link, in the W3C email
lists.

Shelley
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 15:28:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:13 UTC