W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:55:46 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0271001250755u146c179fo46ea9430762466a7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > But let's go further on this. Since I found out that the primary use
> >> > case
> >> > for this change, and in fact, this whole sandbox issue, is comments,
> >> > let's
> >> > talk about comments.
> >>
> >> The use case I think is most important for @sandbox is advertising, as
> >> discussed in some of my earlier emails to the whatwg list.  Apologies
> >> for splitting the discussion over multiple lists.  I know it can be
> >> hard to follow if you're not subscribed to all of them.
> >
> > Oh, so the main customer for this change is Google?
>
> I'd say that the main customer is The New York Times (or any other
> publisher).
>
> Adam
>

Then I would like to see Ian's example focused at the primary customer, not
a customer or use that will, most likely, never happen.

It would help to see how the srcdoc and sandboxing would work with ads for a
customer such as the New York Times.

Shelley
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 15:56:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:00 GMT