W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals)

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:46:28 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0271001181646uad06bectc9097df795d007f6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Shelley has observed a number of cases where the rationales that were
>> supposed to be provided were not adequate (and, no, I don't believe that
>> any response that amounts to "go dig in the email archives" is an
>> adequate response).
> This happens occasionally (especially on editorial issues) when I'm doing
> a lot of bugs at once. Everyone should please feel free to reopen bugs for
> which they feel my rationale was inadequate.
> --

> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL

You rather scathingly told me not to do this when I did, and told me
there was a procedure in place, and to raise an issue and NOT to
reopen the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 00:47:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:57 UTC