W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:32:26 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001190026120.3958@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Shelley has observed a number of cases where the rationales that were 
> supposed to be provided were not adequate (and, no, I don't believe that 
> any response that amounts to "go dig in the email archives" is an 
> adequate response).

This happens occasionally (especially on editorial issues) when I'm doing 
a lot of bugs at once. Everyone should please feel free to reopen bugs for 
which they feel my rationale was inadequate.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 00:32:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:59 GMT