W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: details should be a child

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:23:46 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0271001100823p42a8c3ber482381ec30f7c450@mail.gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
There is an issue[1] and associated change proposal[2] related to the
use of dt/dd in details. You might want to check the proposal out, see
if it addresses your concerns.

Shelley

[1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/83
[2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/DdDt

2010/1/9 Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>:
> Dear WG,
>
> The proposed design for the details element leverages //details/(dt[1] | dd[1]) elements, which I find clearly suboptimal. I suggest putting the optional details element (possibly even multiple) as a child of whatever can have details and having the details inside it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Krzysztof Maczyński
>
>
Received on Sunday, 10 January 2010 16:24:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:12 UTC