W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec]

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:06:20 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0271001081106y2f644582l76fc8d43aebd75a2@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML Weekly WG <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec]
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/93
>>>
>>> This issue was opened in violation of the process and should be closed
>>> without prejudice. The bug in question was reopened for reconsideration,
>>> meaning the next step in the process is 5.c, not 5.d:
>>>
>>>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8379
>>>
>>
>> You have a point. No new information was added, which is justification
>> for re-opening a bug.
>>
>> However, people have stated they were unaware of this bug. I did cc
>> the HTML WG on the bug, but evidently, the email to the group was
>> ignored, or missed.
>
> It appears to me that it was not distributed. Not sure why it is, but
> cc'ing public-html does not seem to yield the expected results of
> having the list receive bugmail.
>
> / Jonas
>

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Nov/0634.html

S
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 19:06:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:12 UTC