W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec]

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:17:23 -0800
Message-ID: <63df84f1001081117t37138a81g7d326d2450f0a7d7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML Weekly WG <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec]
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/93
>>>>
>>>> This issue was opened in violation of the process and should be closed
>>>> without prejudice. The bug in question was reopened for reconsideration,
>>>> meaning the next step in the process is 5.c, not 5.d:
>>>>
>>>>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8379
>>>>
>>>
>>> You have a point. No new information was added, which is justification
>>> for re-opening a bug.
>>>
>>> However, people have stated they were unaware of this bug. I did cc
>>> the HTML WG on the bug, but evidently, the email to the group was
>>> ignored, or missed.
>>
>> It appears to me that it was not distributed. Not sure why it is, but
>> cc'ing public-html does not seem to yield the expected results of
>> having the list receive bugmail.
>>
>> / Jonas
>>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Nov/0634.html

Yes, but no other emails has been sent to the list. Despite the fact
that you cc'ed the public-html list on the bug.

/ Jonas
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 19:18:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:12 UTC