W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec]

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:03:59 -0800
Message-ID: <63df84f1001081103p1150733dp84ae3415aed8cf95@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML Weekly WG <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>
>>> ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/93
>>
>> This issue was opened in violation of the process and should be closed
>> without prejudice. The bug in question was reopened for reconsideration,
>> meaning the next step in the process is 5.c, not 5.d:
>>
>>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8379
>>
>
> You have a point. No new information was added, which is justification
> for re-opening a bug.
>
> However, people have stated they were unaware of this bug. I did cc
> the HTML WG on the bug, but evidently, the email to the group was
> ignored, or missed.

It appears to me that it was not distributed. Not sure why it is, but
cc'ing public-html does not seem to yield the expected results of
having the list receive bugmail.

/ Jonas
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 19:04:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT