- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:53:53 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-html@w3.org
On Aug 21, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Tantek Ã~Gelik wrote: >> >> As far as what elements a particular rel value applies to, I suggest a >> single column: "element restrictions" with permissible values: >> >> * blank or empty - no restrictions, applies to <a>, <area>, <link> >> elements in HTML >> * "only a, area" - only applies to "a, area" elements for example. >> comma separated list of applicable elements. >> * "not link" - applies to everything but the HTML "link" element for >> example. comma separated list of elements that the rel value does NOT >> apply to. Of any non-empty restriction, I see this one being used the >> most often. >> >> If this seems sufficient for the information needed for HTML5, I can go >> ahead and add this column to the table of existing rel-values. > > We actually need slightly more than that, assuming we want to just support > what the spec says now. This is the current description of the WHATWG > wiki RelExtensions page: > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/links.html#other-link-types > > Specifically, we need a description of the effect on <a>/<area> and on > <link>, and a list of synonym keywords for canonicalisation. Are there any link relations that have an effect on both <a>/<area> and on <link>, but not the same effect? Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 02:54:26 UTC