- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:18:50 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 11.08.2010 14:04, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:58:14 +0200, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> If we escalate all the issues that haven't been looked at for over two >> months, that would indeed be a problem. >> >> But it appears to me that the problem that needs to be solved is that >> they don't get attention (one of my bugs is over 3 months old with no >> action so far). > > Maybe, but on the other hand all large projects have bugs that get not > looked at for some time. Ian was away for some time as well and looking > at the general activity it seems emails are on the way down now and I > think bugs will be next: > > http://www.whatwg.org/issues/data.html?period=6 Well, it would be nice if progress on the spec would not depend on a single person's time. Furthermore, it appears that the introduction of the Decision Policy has led to a situation where the WG is focused on process issues, polls, and change proposals. Optimally, instead it would be the place for technical discussion *before* things get escalated. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 12:19:29 UTC