W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-66 image-analysis: informal consensus check

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:30:27 -0500
Message-ID: <n2o643cc0271004300830ncb82834ap232556075631a03a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 30.04.2010 13:27, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> Just a passing observation: if there isn't consensus, the next step is
>> to look for which proposals have would attract the weakest objections.
>> Knowledge of which proposals each of you might support is no where near
>> as useful as knowing which proposals you would actively object to, which
>> in turn is no where near as useful as knowing the basis for such
>> objections.
>> ...
>
> Another observation: I think everything that can be said about this topic
> already has been said. So do we do another round of email exchanges about
> this, or do we move to a survey? (just checking, because I don't want to
> repeat myself over and over).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>

I agree with Julian -- this one has had _considerable_ discussion. I
don't think we'll reach consensus in the email list. I think it's time
to move on to the next phase.

Shelley
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 15:30:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:08 GMT