W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-66 image-analysis: informal consensus check

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:46:42 -0700
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <8CF0CCD2-F580-4A0C-A589-66B3147CB6B4@apple.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On Apr 30, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 30.04.2010 13:27, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> ...
>> Just a passing observation: if there isn't consensus, the next step  
>> is
>> to look for which proposals have would attract the weakest  
>> objections.
>> Knowledge of which proposals each of you might support is no where  
>> near
>> as useful as knowing which proposals you would actively object to,  
>> which
>> in turn is no where near as useful as knowing the basis for such
>> objections.
>> ...
> Another observation: I think everything that can be said about this  
> topic already has been said. So do we do another round of email  
> exchanges about this, or do we move to a survey? (just checking,  
> because I don't want to repeat myself over and over).

Given that we don't have consensus, it's likely we will move to a  
survey soon (unless someone comes up with anamazing compromise  
suggestion that everyone can agree on).

Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 16:47:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:01 UTC