W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-66 image-analysis: informal consensus check

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:14:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4BDAF3F3.1070709@gmx.de>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 30.04.2010 13:27, Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
> Just a passing observation: if there isn't consensus, the next step is
> to look for which proposals have would attract the weakest objections.
> Knowledge of which proposals each of you might support is no where near
> as useful as knowing which proposals you would actively object to, which
> in turn is no where near as useful as knowing the basis for such
> objections.
> ...

Another observation: I think everything that can be said about this 
topic already has been said. So do we do another round of email 
exchanges about this, or do we move to a survey? (just checking, because 
I don't want to repeat myself over and over).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 15:15:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:08 GMT