W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:02:45 -0700
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-id: <D10736D1-77A0-4787-9C79-3FDA42F8D981@apple.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>

On Sep 15, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:

> The 3rd draft of the HTML+RDFa specification has been released and is
> available here:
>
> http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html
>
> The diff-marked version can be found here:
>
> http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa-diff-20090906-20090915.html

I haven't yet checked if the issues I raised are resolved to my  
satisfaction (I plan to do so soon), but I think it's fine to publish  
the current draft as FPWD. I will post a CfC to do so today.

  - Maciej

>
> Changes in this version of the spec include:
>
> * Lots of xmlns: fixes and spec language changes around xmlns:.
> * Explicit references from HTML+RDFa sections to pertinent sections of
>  XHTML+RDFa spec.
> * Explicit language ensuring that RDFa attributes, attribute values,
>  and CURIEs are conforming in HTML5 and XHTML5.
> * Normative pointers to xmlns:-prefixed attribute processing that
>  should be used to create URI mappings in non-XML mode documents.
> * Added editorial warnings about potential changes in xmlns: as
>  the HTML5 document moves toward Last Call and the distributed
>  extensibility issue is addressed.
>
> There are now 2 remaining issues, 6 deferred issues (that should be
> addressed via a separate document, wiki, process), and 30 addressed
> issues. Details on the status/resolution of each issue can be found  
> here:
>
> http://rdfa.info/wiki/html5-rdfa-wd-issues
>
> There have been no issues that have been added to the wiki by  
> reviewers
> or that have been re-opened by reviewers since the last draft was
> published. Discussion related to the second draft didn't produce any
> technical issues, but that doesn't mean there aren't any. If there are
> any new technical issues, they must and will be dealt with during the
> Working Draft phase.
>
> I feel confident that the remaining 2 issues can be addressed and that
> the document is ready for FPWD.
>
> Sam, Paul, Maciej, this is a request to publish HTML+RDFa as a FPWD.
> Please let me know if there is any other W3C process that is required
> before the document can be published as a FPWD.
>
> -- manu
>
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Pirate Bay and Building an Equitable Culture
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/08/30/equitable-culture/
>
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:03:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:08 UTC