W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ]

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:16:04 +0200
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
To: "Jim Jewett" <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.uz88s2ne64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:09:05 +0200, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Toby Inkster wrote a fairly convincing justification for script  
> @implements.
>
> Then, in  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0540.html ,
> Simon Pieters explained why it probably isn't the right approach in
> general and suggested a better alternative for this specific case.
>
> His response is probably too detailed for inclusion in the
> specification itself, but I would hate to see that information lost.
> Is there an "annotated" version, or a collection of rationales, or
> even a variant of a FAQ list where this should be collected?

There is a FAQ on the WHATWG Wiki that also addresses new features:

   http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ

You could add it there I suppose or start a new page specifically for this.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 16:16:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:08 UTC