W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

guidance location? [was: Re: <details> ]

From: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:09:05 -0400
Message-ID: <fb6fbf560909140909o6fd73b7pd2453cc8c97f536c@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
Toby Inkster wrote a fairly convincing justification for script @implements.

Then, in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0540.html ,
Simon Pieters explained why it probably isn't the right approach in
general and suggested a better alternative for this specific case.

His response is probably too detailed for inclusion in the
specification itself, but I would hate to see that information lost.
Is there an "annotated" version, or a collection of rationales, or
even a variant of a FAQ list where this should be collected?

-jJ
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 16:10:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:48 GMT