W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:40:14 -0700
Message-ID: <63df84f0910172340t7e47cb33o8fe35e22ab3906c3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, public-html@w3.org
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote:
>
> Le 16 oct. 2009 à 11:40, Henri Sivonen a écrit :
>>
>> An example of my concern about RDFa is that in uses syntax that in Gecko,
>> WebKit and Presto parses to a different DOM Level 2 representation in
>> text/html and application/xhtml+xml. I can assess whether a proposal has
>> this property even if the proposal is solving a problem I wouldn't
>> personally pursue solving as a priority. This touches on my activities as a
>> parser developer.
>
> Are there (or do you know) plans to actually implement into some of the
> browsers (only one class of products) either microdata, rdfa or microformats
> in the core parsing engine?
>
> I know already some implementations of rdfa and microformats, but as
> external parser.

I'm planning on getting microdata implemented in Firefox. We'd do this
by implementing the DOM APIs described in the spec, as well as
implement hooks so that it'd be easy to create Firefox extensions that
react to microdata formats.

We already have an addon that adds microformats support to Firefox[1],
but I'm not quite sure what that support looks like.

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4106

/ Jonas
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 06:41:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:09 UTC