W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification

From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:30:42 -0400
Message-Id: <3D79DCB8-6A40-4212-87D2-60475D3D0279@la-grange.net>
Cc: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, public-html@w3.org
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>

Le 16 oct. 2009 à 11:40, Henri Sivonen a écrit :
> An example of my concern about RDFa is that in uses syntax that in  
> Gecko, WebKit and Presto parses to a different DOM Level 2  
> representation in text/html and application/xhtml+xml. I can assess  
> whether a proposal has this property even if the proposal is solving  
> a problem I wouldn't personally pursue solving as a priority. This  
> touches on my activities as a parser developer.

Are there (or do you know) plans to actually implement into some of  
the browsers (only one class of products) either microdata, rdfa or  
microformats in the core parsing engine?

I know already some implementations of rdfa and microformats, but as  
external parser.


-- 
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
Received on Saturday, 17 October 2009 21:30:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:09 UTC