W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:59:01 +0300
Cc: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <AF27201C-2F59-4230-9318-4FAC2C5CE050@iki.fi>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
On Oct 18, 2009, at 00:30, Karl Dubost wrote:

> Le 16 oct. 2009 à 11:40, Henri Sivonen a écrit :
>> An example of my concern about RDFa is that in uses syntax that in  
>> Gecko, WebKit and Presto parses to a different DOM Level 2  
>> representation in text/html and application/xhtml+xml. I can assess  
>> whether a proposal has this property even if the proposal is  
>> solving a problem I wouldn't personally pursue solving as a  
>> priority. This touches on my activities as a parser developer.
> Are there (or do you know) plans to actually implement into some of  
> the browsers (only one class of products) either microdata, rdfa or  
> microformats in the core parsing engine?


Henri Sivonen
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 07:59:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:53 UTC