Sam Ruby wrote: > ... > If somebody were able to convince Martin of the need for a revision, or > were to step forward and credibly indicate that they were willing to > take on the entire job, I'm confident that the approach advocated by > Larry would be adopted. > ... Do we have a list of things that we think *need* to be revised? > At the moment, DanC is focusing on a task that he feels that he can > handle, namely the definition of a new concept that is layered on top of > the IRI specification. > ... Which I think is the right approach to handle non-IRI characters (such as SP, or brackets). > ... BR, JulianReceived on Saturday, 28 March 2009 12:17:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:29 GMT