- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:25:29 +0100
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:15:35 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > That distinction doesn't make sense to me. Why normalize when the source > is ISO8859-1, and not when it was UTF-8? Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005May/0022.html the main importance is documents encoded in Windows-1258 written in Vietnamese, but it does not elaborate on why that is so. (Or why making IRIs work for that encoding was important but making them work for HTML, CSS, etc. was not.) > And what if the consumer doesn't even know the encoding (is the source > encoding part of the XML infoset? I guess not). http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/#infoitem.document -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2009 12:26:17 UTC