- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:35:23 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org, site-policy@w3.org
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:03 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > Dailey, David P. wrote: > > I am not sure if Philippe's intention was to have this discussion here at public-html as well > > I'm not certain what plh's intentions were, but given that we were asked > to provide use cases as a group, I would like to gather together a > response as a group. I am planning on attending the AC meeting later > this month, and would like to be able to represent the working group's > position on this matter. Having the response from the HTML Working Group prior to the AC meeting is going to be useful indeed, and discussion on public-html is perfectly appropriate. site-policy isn't a public list so it can't be used for useful discussion. W3C, as a SDO, isn't used to the concept of allowing a fork. On the other hand, the HTML community, which nowadays contains a significant chunk of open source individuals, is perfectly used to that concept. I see the current discussion as a good preparation for the one we'll have at the upcoming AC meeting. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 19:35:37 UTC