On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:03 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > Dailey, David P. wrote: > > I am not sure if Philippe's intention was to have this discussion here at public-html as well > > I'm not certain what plh's intentions were, but given that we were asked > to provide use cases as a group, I would like to gather together a > response as a group. I am planning on attending the AC meeting later > this month, and would like to be able to represent the working group's > position on this matter. Having the response from the HTML Working Group prior to the AC meeting is going to be useful indeed, and discussion on public-html is perfectly appropriate. site-policy isn't a public list so it can't be used for useful discussion. W3C, as a SDO, isn't used to the concept of allowing a fork. On the other hand, the HTML community, which nowadays contains a significant chunk of open source individuals, is perfectly used to that concept. I see the current discussion as a good preparation for the one we'll have at the upcoming AC meeting. PhilippeReceived on Thursday, 5 March 2009 19:35:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:43 UTC