W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:51:26 -0500
Message-ID: <49B02D3E.1040308@intertwingly.net>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
CC: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org, site-policy@w3.org
Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:03 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Dailey, David P. wrote:
>>> I am not sure if Philippe's intention was to have this discussion here at public-html as well
>> I'm not certain what plh's intentions were, but given that we were asked 
>> to provide use cases as a group, I would like to gather together a 
>> response as a group.  I am planning on attending the AC meeting later 
>> this month, and would like to be able to represent the working group's 
>> position on this matter.
> 
> Having the response from the HTML Working Group prior to the AC meeting
> is going to be useful indeed, and discussion on public-html is perfectly
> appropriate. site-policy isn't a public list so it can't be used for
> useful discussion. W3C, as a SDO, isn't used to the concept of allowing
> a fork. On the other hand, the HTML community, which nowadays contains a
> significant chunk of open source individuals, is perfectly used to that
> concept. I see the current discussion as a good preparation for the one
> we'll have at the upcoming AC meeting.

Culture is important.  The following captures a good bit of mine:

   http://markmail.org/message/ss7b54yuhrruysij

> Philippe

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 19:52:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:32 GMT