W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward]

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:39:30 +0000
Message-ID: <49877622.9060500@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, plh@w3.org


Fine, all now completely clear.
Thank you, Sam.
--------
Sam Ruby wrote:

> How about "the W3C license for the HTML 5 Document"?  By that I mean to 
> include any and all of [Working Draft|Candidate Recommendation|Proposed 
> Recommendation|Recommendation|Working Group Note].

Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 22:40:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: James Craig: "Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary""
Previous message: Sam Ruby: "Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward]"
In reply to: Sam Ruby: "Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward]"
Next in thread: Lachlan Hunt: "Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:29 GMT