W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward]

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:20:04 -0500
Message-ID: <49877194.4070000@intertwingly.net>
To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, plh@w3.org

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote:
> One query, Sam :
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>> We started with the license.  In my discussions with Ian and at 
>> Mozilla, I gathered that it was a shared understanding that by October 
>> that the license for the W3C license would be <various things>
> I think I understand what a licence is; I am far
> less certain what a "licence for a licence" is,
> as in "the license for the W3C license".


How about "the W3C license for the HTML 5 Document"?  By that I mean to 
include any and all of [Working Draft|Candidate Recommendation|Proposed 
Recommendation|Recommendation|Working Group Note].

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 22:20:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:42 UTC