- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:18:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > >
> > > On the other hand, the advantage you are citing is only an advantage
> > > if a given resource only contains "up up up", but not also "up up"
> > > and "up". What you be the point of that?
> >
> > A UA that treats any number of "up"s as the same would not interpret
> > "up" as "up1", but as meaning that the referenced document was some
> > higher- level document in the hierarchy.
>
> Again, what would be the point of this case ("up up up" being present,
> but not "up up" and "up")?
Why would they not be present?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 10:17:00 UTC