On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:56:41 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> >> We already have a way to mark up the content that isn't the header, >> footer, sidebars, or navigation: it's the markup that isn't the <header>, >> <footer>, <aside>, or <nav>. > > Yeah, so people will be forced to write crap markup: > > <div role=main> > > rather than just: > > <main> > > Having said that, most people will probably use some variation of > > <section id=main> > <article id=main> > > which would be wrong. > > Given that we cover 4/5 of the authoring practice regarding structuring > content we should just complete it in my opinion and not leave people > confused as to what to do. While I think the idea of a <main> or <content> element might sound worth-while, it would be nice if we could avoid calling the element <content> in order to avoid confusion with the element of the same name (but different namespace) in XBL2. / JonasReceived on Friday, 28 August 2009 08:25:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT