W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: HTML5/SMIL integration [was: Re: ISSUE-10: suggest closing]

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:27:19 -0400
Message-ID: <4A8AC857.1010506@intertwingly.net>
To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
CC: Dick Bulterman <Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, www-smil@w3.org
Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> Dick Bulterman <Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl>, 2009-08-17 08:51 +0200:
> [...]
>>  Unfortunately, I'm away from both my office and a computer this week (on a 
>>  sailboat), so it will take a few days for me to round things out. I'll send 
>>  off comments at the beginning of the week of 24 August.
> 
> The team members of the W3C Interaction domain had a discussion
> about this issue on our weekly call, and I took an action to
> request that it be kept open pending receipt of Dick's review
> comments next week.

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/135

> Also, it seems that the scope of the discussion about issue-10 has
> expanded to include more than just the question "how similar
> should SMIL and <video> attribute names be?" (the current title of
> the issue). We could open up a new issue with a more broadly
> scoped title, but I'd suggest that rather than doing that, the
> issue be re-titled instead.
> 
> Dick, You also might want to consider attending the HTML WG telcon
> on Thursday, August 27 to talk about your review comments.
> 
>   --Mike

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:28:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 10 October 2014 16:24:51 UTC