W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: HTML5/SMIL integration [was: Re: ISSUE-10: suggest closing]

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:45 -0700
Cc: Dick Bulterman <Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl>, HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, www-smil@w3.org
Message-id: <3AC47878-7455-40B1-9AEB-9AAEDE7C98E4@apple.com>
To: Michael Smith <mike@w3.org> (tm)

On Aug 18, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:

> Dick Bulterman <Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl>, 2009-08-17 08:51 +0200:
> [...]
>> Unfortunately, I'm away from both my office and a computer this  
>> week (on a
>> sailboat), so it will take a few days for me to round things out.  
>> I'll send
>> off comments at the beginning of the week of 24 August.
>
> The team members of the W3C Interaction domain had a discussion
> about this issue on our weekly call, and I took an action to
> request that it be kept open pending receipt of Dick's review
> comments next week.
>
> Also, it seems that the scope of the discussion about issue-10 has
> expanded to include more than just the question "how similar
> should SMIL and <video> attribute names be?" (the current title of
> the issue). We could open up a new issue with a more broadly
> scoped title, but I'd suggest that rather than doing that, the
> issue be re-titled instead.
>
> Dick, You also might want to consider attending the HTML WG telcon
> on Thursday, August 27 to talk about your review comments.

I'll leave this issue open until Dick has a chance to comment. If his  
comments are broader than attribute names, then I agree a new issue  
may be more appropriate.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:57:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 10 October 2014 16:24:51 UTC