W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Begin discussions for pushing Last Call into 2010

From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:52:18 -0500
Message-ID: <4A840C82.3020308@burningbird.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote:
> Shelley Powers wrote:
>> ...
>> It seems like, from what you are saying, is that a Formal Objection 
>> is more along the lines of giving a sense of openness within the W3C, 
>> but the openness is more of an illusion than fact.
>>
>> I understand about presenting a technical argument, but if all the WG 
>> has to do is "claim" that it gave due consideration to the  technical 
>> issues raised, then there is no real option. After all, this WG 
>> believes it is giving due consideration to the summary attribute, or the 
> > ...
>
> No, the WG does not believe that. At least not as far as I am concerned.
>
>> ...
>
> BR, Julian
>
Understood, Julian.

Shelley
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 12:52:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 1 October 2014 21:47:35 UTC